Throwing is the same for single button and forward/back. They just do a Bowser Bomb type drop attack. The down attack is the same for every character.
There's an up attack, same attack with weak/strong. There's no forward/backward directional attack, and it's the same if you're pressing weak attack or strong attack. You have the standard aerial attack, which is the same if you're just pressing attack, or if you're holding left or right while pressing attack. I can note some of the gameplay omissions that I find fairly annoying for a game that's supposed to be so heavily influenced by Brawl.Īerial attacks. Ubi could be using this energy working on the next Earthworm Jim or MDK or some other fresh IP. UBIsoft has/had a lot of great IP's, so I equate this game as another movie-cash-in rip-off. In a part you are right, it is a bit of lazy journalism, but it mirrors the lazy game design. Smash Brothers is an iconic enough game that if the mechanics are exactly the same, should they waste time and energy to review every little nuance when one phrase will do.
When I first heard the phrase "TMNT fighter for the Wii" I thought: "WHY?" The other posters here are right, this should've been DLC for Smash Brothers, there aren't enough characters to merit their own fighting game. That being said, I think this whole review got the attention it deserves.
#Ninja turtle smash up online game tv
It's almost like reviewing a Batman game and neglecting to mention if it is based around the Adam West TV show in the 70's rather than the Christian Bale "reboots" close to 40 years later or if it is neither, some like one style choice over the other, since this game has no depth, reviewing the surface details is all they have to work with. I think the one thing Craig did right in the article is recognize that there are fans from different eras that would identify with certain graphic representations, or expect certain charaters in the roster. While I agree whole-heartedly that they SHOULD have used the original TMNT cannon and not the 2007 crap, it is still a fun fighter and be judged as that: a I agree with some of your comments, but to say "the statement about the game not referencing any one specific TMNT source is almost one of the most arbitrary, meaningless comments about a game I've seen on IGN in a while" is wrong. Saying this game is just "Brawl-lite" and just a shoddy rip-off (again, made by the same team) is a slap in the face to the people trying to expand upon their game style. Look at Street Fighter and the King of Fighters series: KoF is a supposed "rip-off" of SF, yet it has it's own unique systems to it that set it apart from SF on MANY levels. A quarter circle forward motion and a button press is a good chance you are pulling off a special move of some sort, but not all fighters are the same. If I play any shooter, a pull of the right trigger will fire my weapon and pressing the A(X on ps3) will make the character jump. Most game types are going to have the same conventions in their control schemes. Looking at it from a competitive standpoint, the characters are more balanced and the combo possibilities are greater than brawl. TEAM) is still a great fighter in its own merit. TMNT, while it may be a "clone" in the eyes of many (even though it was made by the Smash Bros.
#Ninja turtle smash up online game series
After playing the series it opened my eyes to the possibilities of this type of game play in a fighter and I enjoy Brawl immensely. series came along I laughed at it just like most of the competitive fighting game community. As a fighting game fan I have to admit that when the Smash Bros. I totally disagree with the score given to this game.
0 kommentar(er)
